Myanmar: Evidence police deployed sub-machine guns against peaceful protesters, despite denials
Footage shows moment 19-year old woman shot in head by police
Images show a police officer wielding Myanmar-made Uzi variant
A young woman was shot in the head by Myanmar’s security forces during protests, Amnesty International has confirmed after investigating footage showing the attack. This evidence also contradicts Myanmar military claims that security forces were not carrying lethal weapons.
A shared on social media of the shooting, which happened in the capital of Nay Pyi Taw on 9 February, was verified by Amnesty International’s Crisis Evidence experts. According to media reports, the woman has lost significant brain function and has only a slim chance of survival.
The Myanmar military’s ‘True News Information Unit’ said in a statement that security forces only deployed non-lethal weapons. However, show a member of the police (pictured above) wielding a Myanmar-made BA-94 or BA-93 Uzi clone, a Myanmar-made variant of this sub-machine gun.
In the verified coordinates of the image, the alleged police gunman is standing at or close to the other side of the road from where the woman was shot.
The social media materials we have verified show that police recklessly targeted protesters, with no respect for their lives or safety whatsoever.
Sam Dubberley, Head of the Crisis Evidence Lab
The distressing video captures the exact moment the young woman, named on social media as 19-year-old Mya Thwe Thwe Khaing, is hit in the side of her head by a bullet as she turns away from security forces. She had been sheltering with protesters from water cannons behind a bus stop when she was shot.
“The serious injuries sustained by this young woman were caused by the Myanmar police firing live ammunition directly towards peaceful protesters,” said Sam Dubberley, Head of Amnesty International’s Crisis Evidence Lab.
“The social media materials we have verified show that police recklessly targeted protesters, with no respect for their lives or safety whatsoever. Their abhorrent use of lethal force against protesters is unlawful, and must be independently, thoroughly and promptly investigated.
“The Myanmar security forces’ unnecessary and excessive use of force must stop immediately. As protests continue, it is vital that the people’s right to peacefully express their grievances is respected.”
Deadly crackdown on protests
Earlier this week, tens of thousands of people took to the streets across many cities in Myanmar - including Nay Pyi Taw and the country’s two largest cities, Yangon and Mandalay - to peacefully protest the military coup in the country. They were met with by security forces as they attempted to disperse protests.
Amnesty International’s Crisis Evidence Lab examined photographs and video shared to social media of the protest in Nay Pyi Taw on 9 February. After the young woman is hit, further gunshots can be heard later in the video, which also captures fire bursts coming from weapons being wielded by police. The location of the shooting was identified as being on Taungnyo Road, just south-east of the Thabyegone Roundabout in Naypyidaw (coordinates: 19.746822, 96.117287).
Further social media posts show the impact that the bullet had on the helmet the woman was wearing, as well as brain scans that appear to show her significant injuries.
“In policing protests, security forces must always respect, protect and ensure the human rights of organizers and participants,” said Sam Dubberley.
“Security forces must also ensure the safety and security of journalists, other protest monitors and members of the public observing the protests or by-standers.
“The failure of Myanmar’s security forces in this basic duty in this instance is deeply disturbing.”
The UN Human Rights Council is scheduled to hold a in Myanmar today (11 February).
The UN Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials state that security forces must exhaust all non-violent means before employing force as the last resort. These principles also stipulate that the authorities exercise utmost restraint, and only resort to use of firearms to protect against the imminent threat of death or serious injury and when there is no danger for uninvolved people being killed or injured.Reckless firing into a crowd is always unlawful.